#Logic vs pro tools software#
#Logic vs pro tools code#
#Logic vs pro tools professional#

If you are a composer, you use what suits you. It's great for the work I have to do every single day. It would have to absolute torture for me to stop using it.

When 90% of my work comes into and leaves f my studio using a certain program, that's the program I am going to use.

#Logic vs pro tools software#

Some other software would have to be far and away 'superior' in every regard to make anyone want to go through the hassle of 'switching'.Įven the people who 'hate' Pro Tools can't agree on which program deserves to be the 'new industry standard' instead! The whole point of Industry Standard is simply agreement. It is the industry standard because it already is the industry standard. I am wondering because pro tools seems to be the industry standard Fundamentally if there are no bugs then 2 and 3 are completely non issues, and 1 MIGHT produce a difference you could hear if you A/Bd the results of processing with a plugin in two DAWs if you were making significant use of automation, but it wouldn't be the sort of qualitative difference people usually describe, like more treble, or less definition or whatever.

#Logic vs pro tools code#

Well you could get minor differences due to rounding (Logic 5 caused me some serious issues with syncing to bars, which I had to code round but that's probably long since been fixed). Not really much chance for differences there, a MIDI message is completely defined by the message and its time.ģ) Timing information (to let the plugin know song position and tempo) But frankly I've not heard anyone complain about the parameter automation being smooth enough on any DAW Fruity Loops varies blocksize extensively for more accurate parameter automation. Some plugins only respond to parameter change messages at the start of a block (VST2 can only do that) so if you have automation going on, such as a value sweep, then the process block size will make a difference to how smooth that is.

The only further interaction it has with what is going on, and the ways in which these might vary are The DAW gives the plugin a block of samples, says 'process these' and then collects the result. The interaction between a DAW and a plugin is minimal, so there is very little opportunity for a DAW to affect the processing of a plugin. You asked specifically about plugins, and as a plugin developer I can answer that quite specifically.

#Logic vs pro tools professional#

These are just a few considerations you have to take into account.īottom line is that you can make professional recordings with all DAWs on the market, and the key element is not 'how big' your DAW is, but if you know 'how to use' your DAW. Even if you have a perfect test scenario with a qualified test audience that can differentiate more than 'my d!ick is bigger than your d!ck', then you have to establish a blind test and let the test audience judge which signal they hearing is DAW A or DAW B, then you have evaluated the results if they are random or not.Even if you manage to have the same signal then you have to conduct a proper test run, which is very difficult.to have something to compare with, otherwise the results are useless. You have to have the same settings, the same mix, same audio interface, etc.There are so many variables in the mix (so to speak) that you always compare apple with oranges.The question if Logic sounds different than Pro Tools is useless because the answers you will get will be all over the place with no valid point because: I say record and mix in the one that gives you the character and vibe that speaks to you! That was my answer.Yeah I hear ya man! Logic X is not the best for recording guitar because it has a Neve'ish sort of sound, a bit to dark, guitar recording in Pro Tools is a little better because it is more SSL'ish, clean with a bit of character, I suppose that's why most mix engineers prefer it for mixing, like the good old day's on a SSL 4000! Haven't tried Reaper but I hear it's in between Logic & Pro Tools sort of Neve/SSL with a bit API thrown in. The differences between daw's are not that huge but when it comes to guitar instruments good dynamics and string response is a big deal for me. When you play music with plugins always choose the D.A.W that sounds better to you zp you can enjoy music with the quality you like. I always choose for vst recording reaper cause i like how my plugins sounds inside reaper. I have tried pro tools logic reaper cubase DP studio one Ableton etc with my guitar plugins and every DAW sounds a bit different. I m guitar player using vst plugins like amplitube